View profile

Avoid the Cookie Cutter 🍪

MidRange
Avoid the Cookie Cutter 🍪
By Ernie Smith • Issue #138 • View online
The creator economy is often driven by top-tier success stories, rather than lower-rung sustainability. There’s only so much we can take from those stories without watering down the uniqueness of that creation.

Cookie cutter creation just leads to identical-looking cookies. (Joyful/Unsplash)
Cookie cutter creation just leads to identical-looking cookies. (Joyful/Unsplash)
Here’s a common thread I see in digital culture: Someone has a lot of success, and suddenly, there’s a push to see how that success can be replicated. But the result of replicating the success often means that the original creator and the environment around them is diluted, costing everyone a little value along the way.
(A good example of this in action: If you look at Product Hunt, you’ll often see applications that are directly inspired by other applications that have been successful, rather than ideas that are unique and don’t piggyback off of existing ideas.)
The success is often treated as an overly impressive feat and studied for potential lessons, but the truth of the matter is, the best lesson that we can take from it is that there is something inherently unique about that success.
This is a problem, not because I don’t think others deserve success (they do) but because of the fact that every success story ultimately is not reflective of the average person’s experience. The average person in the creator economy is just trying to get by and figure out their own little market; being particularly gifted at cornering said market doesn’t help the vast majority of people who don’t have quite the same formula and skill set.
Rex Woodbury
This is Kat Norton, better known as Miss Excel. She has over a million followers on TikTok and Instagram, where she markets her Excel courses.

She has 0 employees and makes up to $100,000 a day. When we think of the future of work, it might look something like Miss Excel 👇 https://t.co/w4O70eHGme
Ultimately, stories in which we dwell on, say, someone insanely successful at discussing Excel on TikTok, aren’t going to have the same representative experience as anyone else who creates things on TikTok. Not everyone is going to make it onto the Dream Team. And pushing others to create that same kind of experience doesn’t lead us to better work; it leads us to cookie-cutter creation, and that lowers the strength of the whole creative economy, because the results of a cookie-cutter approach will never capture what attracted you to the original creation in the first place.
Fred Scharmen
@rex_woodbury @StephenFleming This is like saying that since a few people end up being professional NBA players, that the future of work is learning to play a sport.
The result is not that we should be looking for the 1% cream-of-the-crop aspirational stories, even if those may seem the most compelling and can drive the most traffic. Instead, if the goal is to raise all boats, it would be better to focus on telling the tales of the creative middle class—the people who may not have quite as compelling a story as someone who is making millions of dollars on YouTube or TikTok, but who have found a degree of sustainability in the work that they do. (They could use the attention, anyway.)
Last month I discussed the fate of the mid-tier creator in the context of “The Newsletter Underclass,” but I think it also needs to be considered more broadly. People with top-shelf skill sets are studied for broader successes, but if their success is not representative of the whole, the result is that their lessons will only go so far unless you totally copy them and lose your unique approach along the way. 
(In case you’re looking for an idea of what I mean, I would point to the work of Simon Owens, who has been quietly mining the lessons of all parts of the creator economy for years.)
The creator economy will be stronger if more people have the space for a unique approach, and that means not looking at only the top-of-the-pile success stories (or at least studying them too hard), but finding ways to tell your own story and finding your own path to success. That sounds harder—and requires looking at more than the usual suspects—but it also will lead to better results in the end.
Related Reads:
Remote Work Before Computers: A Creator Economy Built the Hard Way
Time limit given ⏲: 30 minutes
Time left on clock ⏲: 28 seconds (written on an iPad, on a train!)
If you like this, be sure to check out more of my writing at Tedium: The Dull Side of the Internet.
Do you own a newsletter? Want to try your hand at writing an entire article in 30 minutes or less? If so, let’s do a swap—reply to this email to see about setting something up.
Dig this issue? Let me know! (And make sure you tell others about MidRange!)
Did you enjoy this issue?
Ernie Smith

Hot takes in 30 minutes or less. A newsletter with an unforgiving deadline, written by Ernie Smith—who’s best known for another newsletter, Tedium.

Three times a week (Monday, Tuesday, Thursday). Hope I hit the 30-minute deadline. ⏲

In order to unsubscribe, click here.
If you were forwarded this newsletter and you like it, you can subscribe here.
Powered by Revue